A secular lady from Mumbai wrote that “your thoughts and ideas are often just against Muslims and Christians. I have so many Muslim and Christian friends”
Rejoinder: You may have Muslims and Christians and Marxists as your friend. There may be truth to this claim. However, the spirit of critical thinking has the impetus to explore such issues. They usually come up with slick, simplistic massages that proclaim some unfounded truth,and get fertile ground for many prejudices that promote distorted thinking including terrorism and coercive religious conversion.
Another Hindu from New Delhi wrote “can you solve all the problemsof corruption, power shortage food scarcity, unemployment bydeclaring India as a Hindu Rashtra?” What do we do with converted
Christians and Muslims in the country? Hindus are faced with severe problems and many Hindus have a special style of their own. They encompass fallacies, behavior that detracts from critical thinking and fall prey to such traps.One lady who claims to be devoted to Sai Baba claimed to be a real Hindu who believes in Truth Is One and many call it by different names”. She accused me that I am not a real Hindu.
Few phony liberal Hindus are over committed to pseudo secular ideology. There are times when such over commitment can become both limiting and all consuming. Excessive commitment to pseudo secularism can be seen among some Marxist Hindus, phony liberals,atheists and few secular Swamis. Their excessive commitment to pseudo secularism does not allow new ideas to enter their minds. They perceive everything through their lens of pseudo secularism(attribution Creep) rather than objective lens.Once over commitment and confirmation to pseudo secularism are established, zealousness is not far behind. Under this spell, individual Hindus either refuse to listen to counter arguments (A closed mind) or simply cannot understand or accept alternative explanations… Either way, nothing that contradicts their false belief system is allowed in their minds. They rely on one liners and catch phrases and their stance has extraordinarily dangerous implications for our Hindu Rashtra.
Pingback: COMMON GROUND FOR A HINDU RASHTRA AND STORM CLOUDSFROM THE PSEUDO SECULARISTS-Dr.Babu Suseelan | TDChandna
AS VEER SAVARKER HAS SAID HINDU MEANS WHO SO EVER CONSIDERS THE LAND BETWEEN SINDHU NADHI AND SINDHU SAGAR, AS HIS HIOME LAND AND HOLLYLAND IS HINDU- THIS DEFINITION IS CONSIDERED THE BEST SCIENTIFIC AND WHOLLY ACCEPTABLE- IT IS NOT COMMUNAL- AND IS BASED ON GROUND REALITIES–MERA VEER SAVARKER JI KO NAMAN-THE EXTREEM LOVE FOR HINDUISM AND HINDUSTHAN IS CALLED HINDUTV-
FOR THE SURVIVAL OF HINDUS AND HINDUISM, HINDU RASHTRA IS MUST– WHEN CHISTIANS WITH TOTAL POPULATION OF 250 CRORES HAVE 76 COUNTRIES, MUSLIMS WITH TOTAL POPULATION OF 130 CROVES HAVE 53 COUNTRIES WHY HINDUS HAVING TOTAL POPULATION OF MORE THAN 100 CRORES, SHOULD NOT HAVE A SINGLE HINDU COUNTRY–IF THERE CAN BE ANY HINDU COUNTRY IN THE WORLD, IT SHOULD BE HINDUSTHAN-IN 1947 MUSLIMS INSISTED AND GOT THEIR SHARE AS PAK)ISTAN-THE PARTITION OF UNITED HINDUSTHAN WAS AGREED BY THE PARTIES(CONGRESS AND MUSLIM LEAGUE ON THE BASIS OF TWO NATIONS THEORY THAT IS HINDUS AND MUSLIMS- THEN OBVIOSLY THE REST OF HINDUSTHAN SHOULD BE HINDU COUNTRY-THERE IS NOTHING COMMUNAL IN IT-HINDUS WERE BEFOOLED BY CONGRESS AND GANDHIJI FOR QUITE LONG TIME–NOW HINDUS ARE REALISING THEIR FOOLOSHNESS AND NOW HINDUTV AND HINDU RASHTRA SHOULD BE THE BLOOD AND BREATH OF ALL THE HINDUS