INDIAN CIVIL SOCIETY ACTIVISTS-BUNCH OF FIFTH COLUMNISTS-ANTI HINDU,ANTI INDIA FORCE

HARSH MANDER:
He is a prominent civil society activist and a member of the National
Advisory Council. In a write up in Hindustan Times, dated 13thApril,
2011, he wrote that he did not visit Anna Hazare at the venue of his ‘fast
unto agitation’ in Delhi as he was disturbed by the large portrait of
Bharat Mata that adorned the stage. He was further hurt when he saw
some Hindu leaders like Baba Ramdev, Shri Shri Ravi Shankar and RSS
leader Ram Madhav visiting Anna Hazare. Mander further added that
later when Hazare praised Narendra Modi for the developmental work
undertaken in Gujarat , he was convinced that he took the right decision
by not visiting Anna Hazare at Jantar Mantar.
 A. PADMA

Wife of Ramakrishna, state secretary of CPI-Maoist in
Andhra Pradesh, was arrested by the Orissa police from Koraput district
of Orissa on November 13, 2010. On interrogation by the police, it was
found that she was working under the assumed name Sirishakka since
October 2008 as a home manager cum tutor in “Rainbow” orphanage for
girls, run by ‘Aman Biradari’, an NGO founded by Harsh Mander in
Hyderabad . She was one of the Maoist leaders released by the Orissa
government in exchange of abducted collector of Malkangiri district
R.Vineel Krishna. Harsh Mander, a former IAS officer, who gets upset
by the mere sight of a Bharat Mata portrait had no problem in giving
shelter to a top woman Maoist leader.

MEDHA PATKAR
She is the top most leader of the anti-development lobby in India . The
NGOs floated by her like the National Alliance of People’s Movememt
(NAPM) and Narmada Bachao Andolan had played a stellar role in
blocking or stalling hundreds of big development projects in India since
last 25 years by raking up issues like rehabilitation, loss of livelihood
and environmental pollution. The Narmada project which involves the
construction of a number of small and big dams spread over four states
is delayed by about 20 years because of the obstructionist activities of
Medha Patkar. With the help of some international NGOs, she was also
successful in blocking a $480 million loan sanctioned by the world bank
and another $200 million loan sanctioned by the Japanese government
for the Narmada project. She is also a staunch supporter of the Maoist
movement and was twice attacked by the villagers of Chattisgarh for her
open support to Maoists. In another development, the Supreme Court on
April 5, 2011, has issued notice to Medha Patkar-headed NGO Narmada
Bachao Andolan (NBA) on Madhya Pradesh government’s plea to
initiate perjury proceedings against her NGO for filing a false affidavit
in the court about the alleged acquisition of five villages in MP for
Omkareswar dam project..

ARUNDHATI ROY:- 
On March 6, 2002, Arundhati Roy was sentenced to a ‘symbolic’ one
day in prison by the Supreme Court for her criticism against the court’s
judgment in favour of the Narmada dam project. A two-judge panel had
said that she was guilty of “scandalizing the court and lowering its
dignity through her statements.”
Arundhati Roy is a staunch supporter of the Maoist movement and
describes Maoists as Gandhians with guns. She is also of the firm view
that Afzal Guru who was sentenced to death in the Parliament attack
case is innocent and has criticized the Supreme Court for upholding his
death sentence without even giving him a fair trial. Addressing a
massive anti-India rally organized by Kashmiri separatists in Kashmir
valley on August 18, 2008, Ms.Roy had declared that India needs azadi
from Kashmir as much as Kashmir needs azadi from India . On another
occasion participating in an anti-India seminar organized by the civil 8
society activists in Delhi on October 21, 2010, she thundered that
Kashmir should get azadi from the ‘bhooke-nange’ Hindustan .
Arundhati Roy, who is a strong critic of India ’s nuclear ambitions, had
expressed her shock and anger over the Pokran-II nuclear tests and had
said that she was ashamed to be an Indian. She had further declared
herself as an independent mobile republic and a citizen of earth. She has
written several articles in support of Kashmiri separatists, Maoists and
also against the unjust death sentence given to Afzal Guru in the
Parliament attack case.

SWAMI AGNIVESH-:
On March 26, 2011, Swami Agnivesh and his supporters who went to
Dantewada area in Chattisgarh with some relief materials for the
villagers whose houses were allegedly burned down by the police and
Salva Judum activists, were roughed up and chased out of the area by
angry villagers because of Agnivesh’s links with Maoists. Swami
Agnivesh had also raised slogans hailing Maoists following the release
of five abducted policemen of Chattisgarh by the Maoists on April 15,
2011, as per an affidavit submitted by the Chattisgarh government in the
Supreme Court. This fake Hindu leader is notorious for his close links
with the Maoists.

ARUNA ROY-:
Ms.Aruna Roy is serving as a member of the National Advisory Council
(NAC) for a second time. She started her career as an IAS officer in
1968. She quit the IAS in 1975, opting to become a social activist along
with her husband Sanjit Bunkar Roy at Tilonia, Ajmer district in
Rajastan. She started working independently from 1983 and later
founded the NGO Mazdoor Kisan Sakti Saghatana in 1990. In the name
of empowering the marginalized sections of people, she was found
promoting militancy among the Adivasis and Dalits. She is also a
staunch supporter of the Maoist movement. She won the Ramon
Magsaysay award in 2000 for her work done for the peasants and
workers. She had also played a leading role in the enactment and
implementation of the RTI Act. 9

TEESTA SETALVAD:- 
The Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team which
conducted detailed inquires into various incidents of atrocities during the
Gujarat riots had severely censured rights activist Teesta Satalvad,
Convener of the NGO “Citizens for Justice and Peace” for cooking up
stories and fabricating evidence to dub Hindu activists as rapists and
murderers, deliberately meant to incite anger and hatred among the
Muslims. The SIT led by R.K.Raghavan, former director of CBI, told
the Supreme Court on April 13, 2009 about the involvement of Teesta
Satalvad in fabrication of evidence against the riot accused. In a report
submitted before a Bench comprising of Justices Arijit Pasayat,
P.Sathasivam and Aftab Alam, the SIT alleged that many incidents of
killings and other acts of violence as alleged by Satalvad were actually
cooked up, false charges were leveled and false witnesses were tutored
to give evidence about imaginary incidents. Quoting from the SIT
report, Gujarat counsel and senior advocate Mukul Rohtagi said that 22
witnesses who had submitted identical affidavits before various courts
were questioned by the SIT which found that they had been tutored and
handed over affidavits by Teesta Satalvad, although they had not
actually witnessed any riot incidents. Pointing out a specific instance,
the SIT said how the evidence of 22 witnesses was suspect, owing to the
identical submissions made in their affidavits submitted to the court. The
SIT found that all the 22 affidavits were drafted, typed and printed from
the same computer giving sufficient grounds to believe that they were
tutored. .(“NGOs,Teesta spiced up riot incidents: SIT”, TOI, dated. Aril
15, 2009)

When three catholic nuns were raped by about 20-24 tribals at Jhabua in
Madhya Pradesh on 23d September, 1998, the so-called secular press
and the civil rights activists initially put the blame on Hindu activists
and conducted a campaign against the Sangh Parivar throughout India .
In Mumbai, civil society activists Teesta Satalvad and Asghar Ali
Engineer joined Archbishop Evan Dias in conducting a campaign
against the Sangh Parivar. Catholic schools in Mumbai observed a bandh 10
in protest against the incident and school children were used to conduct
protest morchas. Finally when the investigation was over, it was found
that the accused arrested in the case included 12 tribal Christians, and
not a single Hindu activist was involved.

Teesta Satalvad was pulled up by the Supreme Court on January 11,
2011, for sending copies of communications addressed to Special
Investigation Team (SIT) probing the Gujarat riots to the UN Human
Rights Commission. As in Sri Lanka and elsewhere, the civil rights
activists in India also enjoy the patronage of the UN Human Rights
Commission.

RAMCHANDRA GUHA:- 
On 23, June, 2010, during a lunch-time lecture on his book “India after
Gandhi”organized by Nyenrode, the Netherlands Institute of
International Relations and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, historian and
civil society activist Ramachandra Guha asserted that despite its
impressive economic growth, India will never become an economic
super power. According to him, India ’s enormous economic growth
contains a multitude of sins and he felt that beset with internal problems,
fissures and contradictions, India is unlikely to survive as a nation. He
expressed the view that India should not even dream of becoming a
super power.

LACHIT BORDOLAI AND HIRANYA SAIKYA:-

Civil society activists Lachit Bordolai and Hiranya Saikya figured in the
11-member People’s Consultative Group (PCG) appointed by the UPA
government to hold peace dialogue with the ULFA leaders. Only civil
society activists acceptable to both the Centre and the ULFA leadership
are appointed as members of People’s Consultative Group.
Ironically, in February, 2008, PCG member and a prominent human
rights activist Lachit Bordolai himself was arrested under the NSA by
the Assam police in connection with an ULFA plot to hijack a plane
from Guwahati to Pakistan in 2007. Another PCG member Hiranya
Saikya was also arrested by the Assam police under the Unlawful 11
Activities (Prevention) Act on 22nd. June, 2008 for acting as a conduit
for communicating messages and instructions from the ULFA top brass
to the field activists. In fact all the civil society activists nominated to
the People’s Consultative Group (PCG), including noted writer Indira
Goswami, and accepted as mediators by the government are found to
have close links with the activities of the ULFA.

RAJINDER SACHAR:-
Civil society activist and retired chief justice of Delhi High Court
Rajinder Sachar, through his Sachar Committee report on the status of
Muslims in India had tried to convince the whole world that the
Muslims in India are mostly poor, backward and illiterate as there is
wide-spread discrimination against them in the fields of education and
employment. The report further said that their percentage in government
service is disproportionately low and in the security agencies, it is even
further lower. He used cooked up data, lies and half truths to arrive at
this conclusion. The extent of damage done to the country by this report
can be verified from the coverage of 2008 Mumbai attacks by the
international media. While commenting on the event, a substantial
section of the western media extensively quoted from the Sachar
Committee report to justify the terror attacks in Mumbai as a sort of
retaliation for the ill-treatment of Muslims in India . Sachar, who is a
supporter of various militant movements in India had organized press
conferences in the past to condemn the arrest of Maoist leaders like
Arun Pareria and Maoist supporters like Dr.Binayak Sen. In January,
2000, when Naga under ground leader Th. Muivah was arrested by
Thailand police for traveling from Karachi to Bangkok on a fake
passport, Rajinder Sachar had air-dashed to Bangkok to express his
support and solidarity with the arrested Naga leader.

From the brief account given above about the so-called civil society
activists in India, it is unmistakably clear that all the core activists of the
civil society are simply a bunch of anti-nationals who are cultivated by
certain western agencies to work as a fifth column to promote
fissiparous tendencies in India. These activists do not believe in 12
nationalism or national boundaries. In fact they do not even believe in
the concept of India as a nation state. Their argument is that India was
never a united and independent entity in the past and this
conglomeration of warring kingdoms were brought together by the
British for administrative convenience. They believe that India is still a
conglomeration of different nationalities, who are kept suppressed by the
brutal state power. Supported by the western lobby, these activists
believe that several states in India are on the verge of a civil war and it is
their duty to help the different nationalities in India to achieve their goal
of independence. It is in accordance with such a dangerous doctrine that
the civil society activists are indulging in various disruptive and
antinational activities in India , as stated below.

The civil society activists support all militant and secessionist
movements in India , like Islamic militancy, ULFA, Maoist movement,
Kashmiri separatists, etc.
They are opposed to India ’s nuclear and space programmes.
They are opposed to all development projects in India .
They are against allocation of more funds for strengthening our armed
forces.
They promote militancy among the Adivasis and Dalits and also try to
create differences and clashes between Dalits and upper caste people in
the country.
They try to defame all nationalist forces in the country.
They particularly target Narendra Modi, a highly popular and dynamic
leader and an efficient administrator who has the potential to become a
strong and popular prime minister of India .
They are opposed to all stringent and effective laws meant to curb
terrorism.

Civil society leader Rajinder Sachar was the main speaker at a
convention organized by the left extremists and civil society activists in
New Delhi on April 15, 2010, to condemn the genocidal war crimes
perpetrated by the Sri Lankan government on Tamils in Sri Lanka and 13
India ’s indifference to the plight of Sri Lankan Tamils. One of the
resolutions unanimously passed by the convention is reproduced below.

“The House condemns the Indian state’s war on the various nationalities
fighting for self-determination”.
This resolution clearly shows that the civil society activists consider
people in all insurgency-affected states in India as different nationalities
and they have no inhibition or qualms of conscience in declaring their
open, unambiguous and unashamed support for the various militant and
secessionist movements in the country. It is in such a camp of fifth
columnists that Anna Hazare has landed up now.

Conspiracy behind Anna Hazare’s “Fast unto death” agitation
Anna Hazare’s “Fast unto death” agitation in Delhi from April 5, 2011
was the result of a big conspiracy hatched by the civil society activists,
pro-western English media and the National Advisory Council. The 2G,
CWG and other scams and also the corruption charges raised by former
Union Minister Subramanyam Swami directly against Sonia Gandhi had
all sullied the image of the UPA government very badly and the UPA
had started losing by-elections in different states. Baba Ramdev’s anticorruption campaign was also gaining momentum. Addressing a
mammoth rally against corruption organized by Ramdev’s supporters in
New Delhi on February 27, 2011, Ramdev had openly attacked the
Congress for encouraging corruption in India . Ramdev had planned
more such rallies and the Congress leadership was clearly unnerved.
They knew that something had to be done urgently to divert the attention
of the people and to neutralize Baba Ramdev’s campaign against
corruption and black money. The civil society activists who came to the
rescue of Sonia Gandhi then used Anna Hazare to launch a ‘fast unto
death’ agitation demanding a stronger Lokpal Bill with inclusion of civil
society members in the drafting committee and assuring Hazare national
level mobilization of support for him by the vast and powerful network
of civil society activists. The agitation that lasted for five days had an
electrifying effect on the nation because of the unprecedented projection 14
it got from the press and electronic media. The civil society activists
organized protest demonstrations, dharnas, hunger strike and meetings in
all major cities in India in support of Hazare’s agitation in Delhi . People
in the cities were glued to different TV channels to know the latest
development over Hazare’s fast. The hysteria created by the media over
Hazare’s fast elevated him to the status of a national icon and he seemed
to enjoy it. He probably started having hallucinations about becoming
another Mahatma as indicated by his comment that had he continued his
fast for another three or four days, the UPA government would have
collapsed. Whatever it may be, the five-day ‘fast unto death’ agitation
planned and executed by the civil society activists was a bigger success
than they hoped for as it helped to divert people’s attention from various
scams to the controversial Lokpal Bill relegating the issue of corruption
to the back seat. It also gave a big boost to Hazare’s personal image
placating him and cementing his integration into the civil society club
and cleared the way for the adoption of a stronger and more draconian
Lokpal Bill. The five-day drama also showed how Anna Hazare has
already become a prisoner of the so-called civil society. Anna Hazare
during one of his interactive sessions with the newsmen at his agitational
venue in Delhi had praised the development work done by chief
ministers Narendra Modi and Nitish Kumar in their respective states.
The civil society activists like Medha Patkar and Harsh Mander had
immediately taken objection to Hazare’s praise for Narendra Modi and
drawing his attention to the role of Modi in the genocide of Muslims
during the 2002 communal riots in Gujarat . Anna Hazare subsequently
was forced to issue a clarification stating that he had only praised
Modi’s development work in Gujarat , and not his role in dealing with
the riots.

MEDIA’S ROLE:-
A substantial section of the English media, both the press and electronic,
under the influence of certain western agencies has always been
supporting all anti-social elements and forces in the country for the past
few years. Such biased sections of media had unashamedly supported
Maoist movement, Kashmiri separatists, Islamic militants, etc, in the 15
past. It is the same section of media which went out of the way to project
Anna Hazare as a new messiah of the people and ensured the success of
his ‘fast unto death’ agitation, which makes its intentions suspect. Where
was this media, when Baba Ramdev addressed a massive gathering in
Delhi on February 27ththis year as part of his drive against corruption
and black money? It got hardly any mention in the media. The media
which helped to elevate Anna Hazare to the status of a national icon also
helped the civil society crooks to hijack the anti-corruption drive of
Baba Ramdev, using Anna Hazare. The civil society activists were also
able to snatch a major role in drafting the Lokpal Bill and ensuring
majority representation for them in the proposed all-powerful institution
of Lokpal.


Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to INDIAN CIVIL SOCIETY ACTIVISTS-BUNCH OF FIFTH COLUMNISTS-ANTI HINDU,ANTI INDIA FORCE

  1. Anil Gupta says:

    sir, My suggestion. Whenever you mention the name of Teesta please write her full name that is Teesta Javed Setalwad.

  2. Ram Ohri says:

    Justice (Retd) Sachar has been a close associate of Dr. Ghulam Fai who had worked for long years as an ISI agent in USA. His name for being invited to Dr. Fai’s seminars (on 2 occasions) had been rec ommended by a Major General of Pakistan’s notorious spy agency, the ISI. Even after arrest of Dr. Fai by US police authorities, Justice Sachar unabashedly continued to heap praises on D. Fai. What a man, what a fraud ?

  3. Ram Ohri says:

    In Sachar Report on page 83 the learned Judge has written a long diatribe against teaching of Sanskrit in schools. He says :”The importance given to Sanskkrit in the educational framework in Delhi and many north Indian states has tended to sideline minority languages. Students have to opt for Sanskrit as there is no provision to teach Urdu (or any other regional language) in many schools. This, in effect, makes Sanskrit a compulsory language”.

    Shockingly Justice Sachar wants to give preference to teaching of URDU over teaching of Sanskrit. He does not realise that Sanskrit is one of the world’s OLDEST languages and repository of India’s ancient heritage and Vedas, while Urdu is a hybrid language born out of the accident of history of India’s enslavement by alien invaders! What a Judge? What a man? What an Indian he is?

    Ram Ohri

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s